![durango herald durango herald](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/660798623521751040/rWzWe3x-.jpg)
If we were that type of organization we would have immediately done what other news outlets chose to do. We are not in the business of writing a story to get as many clicks as possible for this to spiral on the internet or social media. We are a storied newspaper with an enormous amount of credibility, we take our journalism seriously, we write stories that are important for the community and watchdogs of government to inform our readers and subscribers to inform our community. “The Durango Herald is a community newspaper that is not interested in writing stories quickly. “Newspapers have an obligation to their staff to have longer discussions about this,” she said.
![durango herald durango herald](https://dur-duweb.newscyclecloud.com/storyimage/DU/20180608/NEWS01/180609607/AR/0/AR-180609607.jpg)
Maestas described moving more slowly almost as a point of pride.
![durango herald durango herald](https://dur-duweb.newscyclecloud.com/storyimage/DU/20160505/NEWS01/160509784/EP/1/4/EP-160509784.jpg)
“It’s a little bit different because we wanted to make sure that we aren’t sensationalizing the story about ourselves.” The paper’s relationship with the sheriff’s office-and the question of how the sheriff would respond-were on the minds of editors, Maestas said. So there was a lot of discussion that had to take place before we were going to react to that.” “We aren’t sources for ourselves, and we’re not trying to make those headlines. We as newsmakers are not out there looking to make news,” she said. She described the factors that she said contributed to the Herald’s more deliberate response, some of which had to do with the paper’s role at the center of the story. In a pair of interviews, Maestas acknowledged that other news outlets had moved more quickly on the story, and that the other coverage “made us ask some different questions” and “made us react a little sooner than we would have.” That story ended up being told first by, and by all indications far more widely read in, other outlets in part due to how online audiences work, but also in part because of the rules that papers like the Herald set for themselves. In this case, a news story with viral potential and particular relevance to the Herald’s local audience practically fell into the paper’s lap. What does seem clear is that the episode highlights the very different publishing ethos still at work in the news business, and some of the consequences of those differences. Olivarius-McAllister believes the Herald wouldn’t have covered the incident at all without the outside attention, a result she says would have been “unacceptable.” Amy Maestas, the Herald’s editor, says that’s not the case the story required discussions among the paper’s leadership, she said, and that took time. There are some differences in the accounts of how the Herald, which knew about the recording before any outside news organization, approached the story. It’s about as low-key a treatment of this material as you could imagine, and for what it’s worth, the middling social sharing stats for the story reflect that. The Herald report leads with an apology from the sheriff for his deputies’ comments. 28, after Jezebel broke news of the recording, and after other news outlets in and near Colorado picked it up. That story, bylined as a staff report, went online the evening of Aug. Practically lost in the flurry of coverage: a 550-word report about the deputies’ comments in The Durango Herald, the paper where the reporter, Chase Olivarius-McAllister, worked.
DURANGO HERALD TV
The reporter who received the voicemail was interviewed on The Today Show, and she made news when she criticized a Colorado TV report about the episode as “ sexist.” The story quickly snowballed, with the news carried on local TV stations, feminist blogs, The Denver Post and other newspapers, and tabloids from New York City to London. 28 by the popular women’s culture website Jezebel, which picked up a YouTube clip of the recording that had been gaining traction on social media. That story blew up online after it was reported on Aug. You might have heard about this one: A local newspaper reporter in Colorado, going through her office voicemail, finds a recording of a handful of sheriff’s deputies making derogatory and objectifying remarks about her appearance, left unwittingly after one of them called her with a message and forgot to hang up the phone.